Verbosities

In my opinion, calling your average political blogger's content "hate speech" is idiotic at best, dishonest at worst. It's amusing to watch O'Reilly and (especially) the little green footballs crew foam at the mouth every time they find something on a lefty blog they breathlessly identify as "hate."

Just because it's fun to point and giggle, and not at all because I believe the people with whom I disagree are automatically engaging in "hate speech," here's Mark Noonan at Blogs for Bush, along with one of his commenters, regarding the "white-hot hatred" endemic to Democrats. Noonan, by the way, is the co-author of a forthcoming book on "the corruption rampant in the Congressional Democratic party, so he's familiar with the general ethos of the pot/kettle argument.


Blogs for Bush: The White House Of The Blogosphere: Democrats to Run Against President Bush in 2008

If you click this link it will bring you to the Demcoratic Senatorial Campaign Committee website, where you will discover that after 10,000 ideas were submitted and the choices were narrowed to four and then rank and file Democrats voted, the DSCC bumper sticker for 2008 is:

"Sorry, W, I'm the Decider; Dems in 08"

Well, Democrats, as you get ready to be the "decider" next year, you want want to take note of the fact that President Bush won't be on the ballot. You go ahead and run against W, we'll run against your actual candidates, and we'll see who wins.

On a more serious note, this shows the depth of hatred Democrats have for a moderately conservative Republican like President Bush. So extremist have they become that they have developed a white-hot hatred for a man who will meet them more than half way on education, health care, social security reform and immigration. This level of hatred is very dangerous for our nation - it illustrates a hardening of positions and an unwillingness to make an attempt to see things from a different point of view. This sort of hatred is the stuff with which civil wars are made - and my advice to you Democrats is to stop it. Really. Before you go too far.

Posted by Mark Noonan at September 7, 2007 06:02 PM

Wow. Who'd be starting a civil war between the basically French pussy pacifist Left and the good ol' gun-toting American Right anyway?


Blogs for Bush: The White House Of The Blogosphere: Democrats to Run Against President Bush in 2008

"the stuff with which civil wars are made - and my advice to you Democrats is to stop it."

You know Mark theres part of me hoping that they don't. We have the guns and ultimately, if forced, the numbers to destroy these morons completely. There is no doubt on who's side the military would be and no doubt that the country, in the long haul, would be better off without them.

Its only our sense of fair play and decency that keeps them safe, even when they are all to often violent and abusive. Perhaps this country needs a good fight to remove the divisive parts and to again present a more cohesive unified front.

I only hope that the consistent, willfully proud ignorance and naivety that many of the left show here is not representative of more than the usual 10% of loonies that exist on both sides.
Posted by: ZootAllure at September 7, 2007 06:50 PM

Shorter Zoot: They're lucky we don't just line them all up and shoot them, but maybe we should anyway.

Remember kids - Blogs for Bush dot com is your one-stop source for all your wingnuttia invective!

Powered by ScribeFire.